Junk Science
©William Gairdner
http://www.williamgairdner.com/
Why do teachers so often force-feed kids
one-sided facts and theories about the world? Wouldn't
education be much more stimulating if schools focused on
broad underlying debates, instead of assumed dogma?
And then there is Darwin. Children are regularly told to learn Darwin's 1859
theory of evolution (you know: from non-life, to cell, to invertebrate, to fish,
to amphibian, to reptile, to mammal, to primate, to man) as a scientific fact,
instead of as a mere theory, which is what Darwin knew it was. He was certain
that completion of the fossil record would eventually show a regular
evolutionary gradation, instead of separate species with huge gaps between them.
But - surprise - no transitional types have been found. All animal and plant
species appeared suddenly in the fossil record, and are as separate as ever.
Species do not change into other species. Even Harvard's Stephen Jay Gould, an
evolutionist, says the highly embarassing absence of transitional forms is "the
trade secret of paleontology."
The really exciting educational fact here is that Darwin's theory of
evolution has been attacked with increasing severity and power this century by
prestigious paleontologists, geologists, transformed cladists, discontinuists,
molecular biologists, creationists (religious as well as atheistic), and
proponents of intelligent design. How exciting. Here is a field that shook the
world, getting shaken down itself. A theory that shook religion...has become a
religion!
But you wouldn't know it to read most school textbooks or classnotes. There
you find more interest in confining students to stale theories, junk science,
and politicized social theory, than offering the far more interesting and
complicated truth. Too bad.